Women 'But women are less violent' stalking 
After what minisro Carfagna stalking female Flavia Amabile A little 'I feared it. After yesterday's article on stalking in some cases it is also female, and discussed a bit '. Here, for example, what the blog wrote 'Feminism in the South':
"I read an article
Flavia Amabile that talks about stalking committed by women. The figure is based on complaints processed by the police headquarters and certainly not upset me that males have been taking advantage of the law to deal with crazy and even more by the poor women who do evil. Among these there is definitely someone who exceeds in reporting and wrong is wrong as anyone trying in every possible way to attract attention to himself 'by people who obviously have no desire to continue that relationship.
What I do not like first of all part concerns the declaration of a psychiatrist who would seem to justify the violent male behavior more generally. It is no coincidence that to date no there is no woman who is physically hurt a man and is very common, the average of one every two days, and we speak only of Italy, the man who kills his ex.
like saying is one thing to try to attract attention and another to persecute their former plan to ruin her life or even kill her.
I read something else that I do not like and refers to a complaint from someone who has endured the former in a quarrel of trust and children. Here I need to turn the head so the bell rings loud alarm and I can think of the whole series of questions posed by the odious separated fathers. Odious to the extent that mothers would disappeared from the face of the earth, intent on making them teasing and refine the stalking mode much more complex: what better way to make life impossible for the former making his suffering like a dog taking away the children? And what better time to take it off the bales to denounce them for stalking?
Far be it from me to justify misconduct and persecutors but if Flavia Amabile does his job faithfully reporting the statements of the minister and psychiatrist, is for us to comment without fear of appearing partial.
What are we talking? A law was touted as the panacea for all ills but it is clear to all that it is insufficient. Only the other day a man under house arrest for stalking is conveniently left out of the house - the media so ridiculous they said it was processed as if it was difficult to "escape" from home - and went to shoot his ex-wife.
Stalking we are talking about is how all this persecution that is socially or physically man to kill a woman. To deprive it of its life, the freedom to go out, work, love still live. It is not about anything except that the psychiatrist attributed to men and women, each considered more reflective and others more oriented to war. Where did you read? The chocolates?
Women are aggressive and if they show to be defined and criminalized are unfeminine and Bull. Women can defend themselves but they should not because there is the man who will do this for you. The women are kept in a state of "reflexivity" because they can not do anything else. But men were entitled to be assholes, cowardly, selfish, aggressive and violent. It 's a legitimate social, cultural and mental well as you can see. There is a violent man in nature as there is no woman reflexive in nature. The man is not naturally femicide, no genes that make it a murderess, because the memory of violence moves in inheritance and of inheritance are the families of the ring transmission and in those families ci siamo anche noi.
L'uomo perseguita in modo violento , lo fa per uccidere, per privare della vita qualcun'altra e lo fa perchè è legittimato socialmente e culturalmente a farlo, perchè l'italia è una repubblica basata sul sessismo e la carfagna ne è la massima rappresentante giacchè occupa il posto di ministro non certo per le sue capacità e la sua esperienza politica.
Perciò la domanda sorge spontanea : come si sta valutando la questione? Che diamine stanno facendo le questure? Che tipo di denunce accolgono? Sanno costoro cos'è lo stalking? E' una cosa ben definita? Preventiva di femminicidi, atti violenti? O è di tutto un po'?
Call
former husband that takes you back in time to do the child go to bed, it is considered stalking?
private Responding to a message that someone is harassing you in public, a forum, a social network, asking him politely to stop, is stalking?
I ask because the attitude of certain individuals is exactly that. He leaves several messages in public. He insisted, trying to attract the attention of other people on something that interested him because everyone should know and if you write in private to ask him to stop he says, "Stop harassing me, I do not want to receive messages from you." This What attitude do you think?
Then there are those who feel entitled to spam and harass you till you drop because you must listen to them and must allow us to come and piss on your blog. How dare you, woman, not to grant a pass to all you gentlemen who can imagine and all we can aspire to?
In that case, the kind requests, appeals do not work. If at the end you say that lawful to defend yourself, then talk about "aggressive women."
course is full of idiots the world and this still does not prevent us from continuing to do the job we do. Turning to
post: What is it made of stalking women?
were saying, there is no denying that women take obsessive attitude towards some people but we are talking about a totally different phenomenon that can hardly lead to physical death of a person. Obvious that the psychological violence and harassment are serious things to consider and then let's talk.
Most women implement forms of indirect aggression. The strategy is the same as bullying. Women can act as a pack or at least stir up a single that is the one that has personal reasons for resentment against the person who will target. From here you will find a number of useful links to understand something on the subject. Why to talk about it must have knowledge of the facts. And here's a facebook group founded for reasons primarily with women who had desire.
Theory aside I could speak of other stories that they told me about it. There's especially one that is explicit in the usual way in which these dynamics are revealed: anonymity.
Where better to implement Internet strategies of indirect aggression?
mode is quite boring and we saw that is used in many other situations.
Two women have relationship problems . One has qualities that make it somewhat inaccessible and the other is a woman quite acidic and poor that first attempt to get into the first and since there are implementing a successful line of competition that aims straight for destruction.
Please note that everything that happens in the mind of the subject and the other competitive of all not know anything until he realizes to be the subject of unexplained attacks.
What you can not have we have to reach and surpass what you can not reach you must destroy it. This is the philosophy of maximum behind these attitudes.
The persecutor she feels neglected, except in his self-centeredness and so begins to use the network of communication to spread lies on the criminal complaint, heavy stuff, gives the main character even of serious crimes and it is on these facts that carves out a kind of complicity with other people knowing how unlikely it is all that is told otherwise acting by third parties, indifferent, passive witnesses of the persecution. Bullying in the third parties with a specific role because they help to activate lines of continuity with the game carries on harassing the persecutor. The person being harassed
continues to make his life and get results personal, some recognition is realized in the work and also in private life. Does everything that the persecutor would like to do, but instead of calling to tell her "you know, for ten years I'm dying of envy for you" thaw activating mechanisms rather than continuing to feed his obsession, it shall raise the bar of harassment and begins to leave anonymous messages on the Internet seriously violating the privacy of the other, putting in place your name, phone number, address, mixed private information to its distortion.
The victim of this whole thing obviously at this point knows what is happening but does not know who that is. In his naivete is not even occur to associate those anonymous harassment to gossip put around some time ago. Besides, has not had time to devote great attention because in the meantime has also had a son.
She turns to protection commissioner, wrote to Internet contacts responsible for the news pages as they appear to require their removal. In a short time the abuser is banned from a number of areas and yet still insists. Goes further: he began to write anonymous messages and sends them via mail and a public site where his victim from time to time exchange of notes with professional colleagues. He wants to be sure that everything and everyone they know and want to destroy, ruin.
E 'then point that the person we are talking about is obliged to make a complaint to the police post. Reporting a persecutor or a persecutor anonymous on the Internet is an act of surrender, a way to give his life to law enforcement agencies become aware of a number to be subtracted as privacy and security that comes from the questions themselves. Therefore, we reason digital self-defense because we must find an alternative that we see the protagonists and able to defend ourselves.
However our story ends with a complaint for libel. The postal pick the ip address from which the persecutor was writing, and formally accused of any activity smear - since in the period we are talking about stalking was not considered a crime - then everything would become a case in court. It was then that he learned the victim of such harassment and felt a great pain for this woman who was ruining his life. The persecutor was subject to restrictions and ceased to do what he had done until then.
Do you know why? Simply because the harassment, bullying, harassment, stalking, whatever you want to call it, feeds on an indirect conflict, cowardly act in secret. When brought to light, if the person is required to address the conflict directly, complete with signature, name, aware of the consequences but also unable to power lies in the eyes looking at the person whom it is issued, then all of a sudden stop or take a different way.
This unfortunately males are great because they can cloak of dignity to blossom theoretical concepts of intimidation and incitement to violence against women just as the fascists stoned the world with lies and revisionist talk of any kind.
Males are trained in this for centuries because it is that they are obliged to defend themselves in public with accusations of harassment. Consciously lies and make them pass the victim as a participatory and consensual "whore" inclined to rape or little woman who invented accusations of harassment that they claim not to be true. The lesson of Dominique, the girl from london who denounced his university professor who asked for sexual favors in exchange for good grades, remains a model to understand the behavior of some males in private nuisance and round omelettes and liars in public. A tip
? What are anonymous harassers and harassed / and no one cares because in the long run between abuser and molestat @ you establish a "relationship", a kind of empathy that makes you understand who the anonymous @ always leaving messages on every free wall.
Talk to them, directly, invite them / and to discuss it. Act conflict to determine its fate. If you act like victims than victims. If you act by women who do not bask in the role of victims, but intend to pick up their lives without intimidation to sell it to the first round then we must address the issue with all the prudence of the case.
It 'clear that if there is a person who writes then you write, if there is a person who speaks to you speak, if there is a person who wants you to kill, the stalker, your ex, know that there is nothing to say and you just have to keep up away.
The difference between harassment, bullying and harassment aim is to kill you all here. Bullying if you deal directly have a hope of solving it. Not sure, I hope that, ever so cautiously. The persecution did not work out because the only way I never have to solve it is to surrender your life to continue to submit to violence, however, until the time comes for you to die at the hands of man. Stategli away and if you do not do it alone in that case do not be afraid to ask for help.
Get help from an anti-violence center is essential because against a man who wants to kill you can not fight alone.
I recommend my friends. Take care of you. "
http://www.lastampa.it/_web/CMSTP/tmplrubriche/giornalisti/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=124&ID_articolo=771&ID_sezione=274&sezione =
